How Fair Value Gaps Reveal Hidden Institutional Intent

Wiki Article

Fair Value Gaps represent one of the few repeatable patterns that consistently expose the imbalance driving institutional pricing.

According to the research philosophies of Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital, Fair Value Gaps are the market’s way of revealing inefficiencies created when institutional orders hit the market too aggressively for price to fill normally.

Where Fair Value Gaps Come From

An FVG represents an inefficiency—an area where price moved too fast for opposing traders to fill orders.

The Institutional Logic Behind FVGs

Because institutions require massive liquidity, they often leave gaps behind due to the size of their orders.

A Simple, Professional FVG Workflow
1. Identify the Displacement

Displacement confirms that institutional activity caused the imbalance.

Outline the Exact Imbalance Zone

Highlight the zone between the prior candle’s high and the next candle’s low (or vice versa).

3. Wait for the Retracement

The best entries occur when price revisits the FVG, taps into it, check here and shows signs of rejection or continuation.

4. Align With Market Structure

An FVG entry aligned with higher-timeframe direction is exponentially more effective.

5. Use FVGs as Targets

Just as price gravitates back to FVGs for entries, it also moves toward FVGs when they act as future magnets.

The Result?

They reveal where institutional orders entered, where they left inefficiencies, and where price is likely to return.

Combine FVG logic with market structure, liquidity pools, and volume confirmation, and you have one of the strongest frameworks available to retail traders today—one that aligns perfectly with the advanced methodologies taught inside Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital.

FVGs aren’t signals—they’re context.
And once you learn their language, the market starts to speak back.